On Thu, Aug 5, 2021 at 8:13 AM Alex Bennée <alex.ben...@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> John Snow <js...@redhat.com> writes:
>
> > The hallmark of any truly great taxonomical reorganization: the bin of
> > leftover bits and pieces that didn't neatly fit elsewhere.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: John Snow <js...@redhat.com>
> > ---
> >  docs/devel/index.rst        |  9 +--------
> >  docs/devel/section-misc.rst | 15 +++++++++++++++
> >  2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> >  create mode 100644 docs/devel/section-misc.rst
> >
> > diff --git a/docs/devel/index.rst b/docs/devel/index.rst
> > index da579a7b666..ef14f3302e1 100644
> > --- a/docs/devel/index.rst
> > +++ b/docs/devel/index.rst
> > @@ -14,11 +14,4 @@ modifying QEMU's source code.
> >     section-testing-debugging
> >     section-tcg
> >     section-subsystems
> > -   control-flow-integrity
> > -   decodetree
>
> decodetree is TCG as per Peter's comment
>
> > -   s390-dasd-ipl
> > -   qom
>
> I feel as though QOM should be in the Developing QEMU section as it's a
> fairly core part of the programming experience. Maybe?
>
>
I'm guilty of doing a lot of things in parallel, because I wasn't sure
which things would be accepted quickly and which might lead to a longer
process, but I intend to create an "API" section that covers QOM, qdev,
QMP, etc -- I just recently converted the qmp/qapi docs, so there's enough
for a nice subsection there.


> Anyway it's an improvement:
>
> Reviewed-by: Alex Bennée <alex.ben...@linaro.org>
>
>
Thanks. I'll have to re-spin anyway because of the QAPI doc work I did, so
there's time to talk about this one.

--js

Reply via email to