Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org> writes:
> "make check-acceptance" takes way way too long. I just did a run > on an arm-and-aarch64-targets-only debug build and it took over > half an hour, and this despite it skipping or cancelling 26 out > of 58 tests! > > I think that ~10 minutes runtime is reasonable. 30 is not; > ideally no individual test would take more than a minute or so. > > Output saying where the time went. The first two tests take > more than 10 minutes *each*. I think a good start would be to find > a way of testing what they're testing that is less heavyweight. > > (01/58) tests/acceptance/boot_linux.py:BootLinuxAarch64.test_virt_tcg_gicv2: > PASS (629.74 s) > (02/58) tests/acceptance/boot_linux.py:BootLinuxAarch64.test_virt_tcg_gicv3: > PASS (628.75 s) > (03/58) tests/acceptance/boot_linux.py:BootLinuxAarch64.test_virt_kvm: > CANCEL: kvm accelerator does not seem to be available (1.18 s) For these tests which purport to exercise the various GIC configurations I think we would be much better served by running kvm-unit-tests which at least try and exercise all the features rather than rely on the side effect of booting an entire OS. > (04/58) > tests/acceptance/boot_linux_console.py:BootLinuxConsole.test_aarch64_virt: > PASS (3.53 s) > (05/58) > tests/acceptance/boot_linux_console.py:BootLinuxConsole.test_aarch64_xlnx_versal_virt: > PASS (41.13 s) > (06/58) > tests/acceptance/boot_linux_console.py:BootLinuxConsole.test_arm_virt: > PASS (5.22 s) > (07/58) > tests/acceptance/boot_linux_console.py:BootLinuxConsole.test_arm_emcraft_sf2: > PASS (18.88 s) > (08/58) > tests/acceptance/boot_linux_console.py:BootLinuxConsole.test_arm_raspi2_uart0: > PASS (11.30 s) > (09/58) > tests/acceptance/boot_linux_console.py:BootLinuxConsole.test_arm_raspi2_initrd: > PASS (22.66 s) > (10/58) > tests/acceptance/boot_linux_console.py:BootLinuxConsole.test_arm_exynos4210_initrd: > PASS (31.89 s) > (11/58) > tests/acceptance/boot_linux_console.py:BootLinuxConsole.test_arm_cubieboard_initrd: > PASS (27.86 s) > (12/58) > tests/acceptance/boot_linux_console.py:BootLinuxConsole.test_arm_cubieboard_sata: > PASS (27.19 s) > (13/58) > tests/acceptance/boot_linux_console.py:BootLinuxConsole.test_arm_quanta_gsj: > SKIP: Test might timeout > (14/58) > tests/acceptance/boot_linux_console.py:BootLinuxConsole.test_arm_quanta_gsj_initrd: > PASS (22.53 s) > (15/58) > tests/acceptance/boot_linux_console.py:BootLinuxConsole.test_arm_orangepi: > PASS (4.86 s) > (16/58) > tests/acceptance/boot_linux_console.py:BootLinuxConsole.test_arm_orangepi_initrd: > PASS (39.85 s) > (17/58) > tests/acceptance/boot_linux_console.py:BootLinuxConsole.test_arm_orangepi_sd: > PASS (53.57 s) > (18/58) > tests/acceptance/boot_linux_console.py:BootLinuxConsole.test_arm_orangepi_bionic_20_08: > SKIP: storage limited > (19/58) > tests/acceptance/boot_linux_console.py:BootLinuxConsole.test_arm_orangepi_uboot_netbsd9: > SKIP: storage limited > (20/58) > tests/acceptance/boot_linux_console.py:BootLinuxConsole.test_aarch64_raspi3_atf: > PASS (1.50 s) > (21/58) > tests/acceptance/boot_linux_console.py:BootLinuxConsole.test_arm_vexpressa9: > PASS (10.74 s) > (22/58) > tests/acceptance/boot_linux_console.py:BootLinuxConsole.test_arm_ast2400_palmetto_openbmc_v2_9_0: > PASS (39.43 s) > (23/58) > tests/acceptance/boot_linux_console.py:BootLinuxConsole.test_arm_ast2500_romulus_openbmc_v2_9_0: > PASS (54.01 s) > (24/58) > tests/acceptance/boot_linux_console.py:BootLinuxConsole.test_arm_ast2600_debian: > PASS (40.60 s) > (25/58) tests/acceptance/boot_xen.py:BootXen.test_arm64_xen_411_and_dom0: > PASS (20.22 s) > (26/58) tests/acceptance/boot_xen.py:BootXen.test_arm64_xen_414_and_dom0: > PASS (17.37 s) > (27/58) tests/acceptance/boot_xen.py:BootXen.test_arm64_xen_415_and_dom0: > PASS (23.82 s) > (28/58) tests/acceptance/empty_cpu_model.py:EmptyCPUModel.test: > CANCEL: No QEMU binary defined or found in the build tree (0.00 s) > (29/58) tests/acceptance/info_usernet.py:InfoUsernet.test_hostfwd: > CANCEL: No QEMU binary defined or found in the build tree (0.00 s) > (30/58) > tests/acceptance/machine_arm_canona1100.py:CanonA1100Machine.test_arm_canona1100: > PASS (0.20 s) > (31/58) > tests/acceptance/machine_arm_integratorcp.py:IntegratorMachine.test_integratorcp_console: > SKIP: untrusted code > (32/58) > tests/acceptance/machine_arm_integratorcp.py:IntegratorMachine.test_framebuffer_tux_logo: > SKIP: Python NumPy not installed > (33/58) tests/acceptance/machine_arm_n8x0.py:N8x0Machine.test_n800: > SKIP: untrusted code > (34/58) tests/acceptance/machine_arm_n8x0.py:N8x0Machine.test_n810: > SKIP: untrusted code > (35/58) > tests/acceptance/migration.py:Migration.test_migration_with_tcp_localhost: > CANCEL: No QEMU binary defined or found in the build tree (0.00 s) > (36/58) tests/acceptance/migration.py:Migration.test_migration_with_unix: > CANCEL: No QEMU binary defined or found in the build tree (0.00 s) > (37/58) tests/acceptance/migration.py:Migration.test_migration_with_exec: > CANCEL: No QEMU binary defined or found in the build tree (0.00 s) > (38/58) > tests/acceptance/multiprocess.py:Multiprocess.test_multiprocess_aarch64: > CANCEL: kvm accelerator does not seem to be available (0.06 s) > (39/58) > tests/acceptance/replay_kernel.py:ReplayKernelNormal.test_aarch64_virt: > PASS (19.59 s) > (40/58) tests/acceptance/replay_kernel.py:ReplayKernelNormal.test_arm_virt: > PASS (28.73 s) > (41/58) > tests/acceptance/replay_kernel.py:ReplayKernelNormal.test_arm_cubieboard_initrd: > PASS (52.00 s) > (42/58) > tests/acceptance/replay_kernel.py:ReplayKernelNormal.test_arm_vexpressa9: > PASS (25.69 s) > (43/58) > tests/acceptance/reverse_debugging.py:ReverseDebugging_AArch64.test_aarch64_virt: > PASS (2.16 s) > (44/58) tests/acceptance/smmu.py:SMMU.test_smmu_noril: CANCEL: kvm > accelerator does not seem to be available (0.90 s) > (45/58) tests/acceptance/smmu.py:SMMU.test_smmu_noril_passthrough: > CANCEL: kvm accelerator does not seem to be available (0.70 s) > (46/58) tests/acceptance/smmu.py:SMMU.test_smmu_noril_nostrict: > CANCEL: kvm accelerator does not seem to be available (1.02 s) > (47/58) tests/acceptance/smmu.py:SMMU.test_smmu_ril: CANCEL: kvm > accelerator does not seem to be available (0.68 s) > (48/58) tests/acceptance/smmu.py:SMMU.test_smmu_ril_passthrough: > CANCEL: kvm accelerator does not seem to be available (0.98 s) > (49/58) tests/acceptance/smmu.py:SMMU.test_smmu_ril_nostrict: CANCEL: > kvm accelerator does not seem to be available (1.00 s) > (50/58) > tests/acceptance/tcg_plugins.py:PluginKernelNormal.test_aarch64_virt_insn: > PASS (12.19 s) > (51/58) > tests/acceptance/tcg_plugins.py:PluginKernelNormal.test_aarch64_virt_insn_icount: > PASS (12.35 s) > (52/58) > tests/acceptance/tcg_plugins.py:PluginKernelNormal.test_aarch64_virt_mem_icount: > PASS (10.21 s) > (53/58) tests/acceptance/version.py:Version.test_qmp_human_info_version: > CANCEL: No QEMU binary defined or found in the build tree (0.00 s) > (54/58) > tests/acceptance/virtio_check_params.py:VirtioMaxSegSettingsCheck.test_machine_types: > SKIP: break multi-arch CI > (55/58) tests/acceptance/vnc.py:Vnc.test_no_vnc: CANCEL: No QEMU > binary defined or found in the build tree (0.00 s) > (56/58) tests/acceptance/vnc.py:Vnc.test_no_vnc_change_password: > CANCEL: No QEMU binary defined or found in the build tree (0.00 s) > (57/58) tests/acceptance/vnc.py:Vnc.test_change_password_requires_a_password: > CANCEL: No QEMU binary defined or found in the build tree (0.00 s) > (58/58) tests/acceptance/vnc.py:Vnc.test_change_password: CANCEL: No > QEMU binary defined or found in the build tree (0.00 s) > RESULTS : PASS 32 | ERROR 0 | FAIL 0 | SKIP 8 | WARN 0 | INTERRUPT > 0 | CANCEL 18 > JOB TIME : 1967.44 s > > thanks > -- PMM -- Alex Bennée
