Add two new subsection headings to make the separation between
"declaration macros" and "definition macros" more visible.

Signed-off-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabk...@redhat.com>
---
 docs/devel/qom.rst | 6 ++++++
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)

diff --git a/docs/devel/qom.rst b/docs/devel/qom.rst
index 3f48016aa8f..05d045bf570 100644
--- a/docs/devel/qom.rst
+++ b/docs/devel/qom.rst
@@ -285,6 +285,9 @@ convention. To reduce the amount of boilerplate code that 
needs to be
 written for a new type there are two sets of macros to generate the
 common parts in a standard format.
 
+Type declaration macros
+-----------------------
+
 A type is declared using the ``OBJECT_DECLARE`` macro family. In types
 which do not require any virtual functions in the class, the
 `OBJECT_DECLARE_SIMPLE_TYPE` macro is suitable, and is commonly placed
@@ -323,6 +326,9 @@ struct, then the alternative `OBJECT_DECLARE_TYPE()` macro 
can be
 used. This does the same as `OBJECT_DECLARE_SIMPLE_TYPE()`, but without
 the 'struct MyDeviceClass' definition.
 
+Type definition macros
+----------------------
+
 To implement the type, the ``OBJECT_DEFINE`` macro family is available.
 In the simple case the `OBJECT_DEFINE_TYPE()` macro is suitable:
 
-- 
2.31.1


Reply via email to