On 22/07/21 15:37, Andrew Jones wrote:
This doesn't mention zero inputs and even implies non-zero inputs.I'm not sure if we need to worry about the odd command line that used zero for some parameters. What do you think?
I think I agree as well, however the patch that Yanan sent has unnecessary duplication between smp_parse and pc_smp_parse. machine_set_smp is a better place to implement this kind of check.
Paolo
