On Tue, Jul 20, 2021 at 8:03 AM Joe Komlodi <joe.koml...@xilinx.com> wrote:
>
> If we have a field that's wider than 32-bits, we need a data type wide enough
> to
> be able to create the bitfield used to deposit the value.
>
> Signed-off-by: Joe Komlodi <joe.koml...@xilinx.com>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.fran...@wdc.com>
Alistair
> ---
> include/hw/registerfields.h | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/hw/registerfields.h b/include/hw/registerfields.h
> index 9a03ac5..f2a3c9c 100644
> --- a/include/hw/registerfields.h
> +++ b/include/hw/registerfields.h
> @@ -95,7 +95,7 @@
> _d; })
> #define FIELD_DP64(storage, reg, field, val) ({ \
> struct { \
> - unsigned int v:R_ ## reg ## _ ## field ## _LENGTH; \
> + uint64_t v:R_ ## reg ## _ ## field ## _LENGTH; \
> } _v = { .v = val }; \
> uint64_t _d; \
> _d = deposit64((storage), R_ ## reg ## _ ## field ## _SHIFT, \
> --
> 2.7.4
>
>
