On 7/13/21 12:46 PM, Taylor Simpson wrote:
Add a check that the SIGSEGV handler is called

Signed-off-by: Taylor Simpson <tsimp...@quicinc.com>
---
  tests/tcg/multiarch/linux-test.c | 7 +++++++
  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tests/tcg/multiarch/linux-test.c b/tests/tcg/multiarch/linux-test.c
index c8c6aed..cb845c9 100644
--- a/tests/tcg/multiarch/linux-test.c
+++ b/tests/tcg/multiarch/linux-test.c
@@ -439,10 +439,13 @@ static void sig_alarm(int sig)
      alarm_count++;
  }
+static int sig_segv_called;
+
  static void sig_segv(int sig, siginfo_t *info, void *puc)
  {
      if (sig != SIGSEGV)
          error("signal");
+    sig_segv_called = 1;

Either bool or a count.

Otherwise,
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.hender...@linaro.org>

r~

      longjmp(jmp_env, 1);
  }
@@ -492,6 +495,10 @@ static void test_signal(void)
          *(volatile uint8_t *)0 = 0;
      }
+ if (sig_segv_called == 0) {
+        error("SIGSEGV handler not called");
+    }
+
      act.sa_handler = SIG_DFL;
      sigemptyset(&act.sa_mask);
      act.sa_flags = 0;



Reply via email to