On Mon, 28 Jun 2021 at 13:05, Song Gao <gaos...@loongson.cn> wrote: > > Add files to linux-user/loongarch64 > Add file to default-configs > Add loongarch to target/meson.build > > Signed-off-by: Song Gao <gaos...@loongson.cn> > --- > MAINTAINERS | 1 + > default-configs/targets/loongarch64-linux-user.mak | 4 + > include/elf.h | 2 + > linux-user/elfload.c | 58 ++++ > linux-user/loongarch64/cpu_loop.c | 177 ++++++++++++ > linux-user/loongarch64/signal.c | 193 +++++++++++++ > linux-user/loongarch64/sockbits.h | 1 + > linux-user/loongarch64/syscall_nr.h | 307 > +++++++++++++++++++++ > linux-user/loongarch64/target_cpu.h | 36 +++ > linux-user/loongarch64/target_elf.h | 14 + > linux-user/loongarch64/target_fcntl.h | 12 + > linux-user/loongarch64/target_signal.h | 28 ++ > linux-user/loongarch64/target_structs.h | 49 ++++ > linux-user/loongarch64/target_syscall.h | 46 +++ > linux-user/loongarch64/termbits.h | 229 +++++++++++++++ > linux-user/syscall_defs.h | 8 +- > meson.build | 2 +- > qapi/machine-target.json | 4 +- > target/loongarch/meson.build | 19 ++ > target/meson.build | 1 + > 20 files changed, 1185 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
This is a massive patch that would benefit from being split up into multiple smaller patches. I'm told by a kernel developer that loongarch hasn't yet been accepted into the Linux kernel mainline. Until it has been, the syscall ABI for it is not yet stable, so we won't be able to take the linux-user patches for it yet. (We have been burned in the past by taking linux-user architecture support patches without realizing they weren't for a stable ABI, and then being out of sync with the eventual upstream kernel ABI that was accepted.) We can certainly do code review in the meantime, though. thanks -- PMM
