On Sun, Jun 20, 2021 at 11:16 PM Laurent Vivier <laur...@vivier.eu> wrote:
>
> Le 31/05/2021 à 07:50, YAMAMOTO Takashi a écrit :
> > It's problematic to return AT_EXECFD as it is because the user app
> > would close it.
> > This patch opens it via /proc/self/fd instead.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: YAMAMOTO Takashi <yamam...@midokura.com>
> > ---
> > linux-user/syscall.c | 12 +++++++++++-
> > 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/linux-user/syscall.c b/linux-user/syscall.c
> > index a2b03ecb8b..14a63518e2 100644
> > --- a/linux-user/syscall.c
> > +++ b/linux-user/syscall.c
> > @@ -8118,7 +8118,17 @@ static int do_openat(void *cpu_env, int dirfd, const
> > char *pathname, int flags,
> >
> > if (is_proc_myself(pathname, "exe")) {
> > int execfd = qemu_getauxval(AT_EXECFD);
> > - return execfd ? execfd : safe_openat(dirfd, exec_path, flags,
> > mode);
> > + if (execfd) {
> > + char filename[PATH_MAX];
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + snprintf(filename, sizeof(filename), "/proc/self/fd/%d",
> > execfd);
> > + ret = safe_openat(dirfd, filename, flags, mode);
> > + if (ret != -1) {
> > + return ret;
> > + }
> > + }
> > + return safe_openat(dirfd, exec_path, flags, mode);
> > }
> >
> > for (fake_open = fakes; fake_open->filename; fake_open++) {
> >
>
> I think a dup() would be more appropriate, or explain why not.
i did this way because dup() doesn't deal with open flags.
>
> Thanks,
> Laurent
