On Sat, Jun 12, 2021 at 6:16 PM Laurent Vivier <laur...@vivier.eu> wrote: > > Le 12/06/2021 à 17:00, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé a écrit : > > Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4...@amsat.org> > > --- > > tests/qtest/fuzz/generic_fuzz.c | 2 +- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/tests/qtest/fuzz/generic_fuzz.c > > b/tests/qtest/fuzz/generic_fuzz.c > > index cea7d4058e8..1307299df52 100644 > > --- a/tests/qtest/fuzz/generic_fuzz.c > > +++ b/tests/qtest/fuzz/generic_fuzz.c > > @@ -841,7 +841,7 @@ static void generic_pre_fuzz(QTestState *s) > > > > g_hash_table_iter_init(&iter, fuzzable_memoryregions); > > while (g_hash_table_iter_next(&iter, (gpointer)&mr, NULL)) { > > - printf(" * %s (size %lx)\n", > > + printf(" * %s (size 0x%lx)\n", > > object_get_canonical_path_component(&(mr->parent_obj)), > > (uint64_t)mr->size); > > } > > > > What about a "0x%"PRIx64 ?
Ah, I only looked at the format. Even better: also use memory_region_size().