On Sun, Oct 09, 2011 at 10:49:57AM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote: > As explained in the other replies: It is way more future-proof to use an > interface for this which was designed for it (remote gdb) instead of > artificially relaxing reasonable constraints of the migration mechanism > plus having to follow that format with the post-processing tool.
Any interface that isn't "get this information off my production server *now*" so that I can get the server restarted, and send it to an expert to analyse -- is a poor interface, whether it was designed like that or not. Perhaps we don't have the right interface at all, but remote gdb is not it. Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones virt-top is 'top' for virtual machines. Tiny program with many powerful monitoring features, net stats, disk stats, logging, etc. http://et.redhat.com/~rjones/virt-top
