On Thu, Jun 3, 2021 at 10:29 AM Claudio Fontana <cfont...@suse.de> wrote:
> On 6/3/21 2:29 PM, Claudio Fontana wrote: > > v1 -> v2: > > * moved hyperv realizefn call before cpu expansion (Vitaly) > > * added more comments (Eduardo) > > * fixed references to commit ids (Eduardo) > > > > The combination of Commits: > > f5cc5a5c ("i386: split cpu accelerators from cpu.c"...) > > > 30565f10 ("cpu: call AccelCPUClass::cpu_realizefn in"...) > > > > introduced two bugs that break cpu max and host in the refactoring, > > by running initializations in the wrong order. > > > > This small series of two patches is an attempt to correct the situation. > > > > Please provide your test results and feedback, thanks! > > > > Claudio > > > > Claudio Fontana (2): > > i386: reorder call to cpu_exec_realizefn in x86_cpu_realizefn > > i386: run accel_cpu_instance_init as instance_post_init > > > > target/i386/cpu.c | 89 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------- > > target/i386/kvm/kvm-cpu.c | 12 +++++- > > 2 files changed, 68 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-) > > > > Btw, CI/CD is all green, but as mentioned, it does not seem to catch these > kind of issues. > > Hi Claudio, Not familiar with the specifics of this bug, but can it be caught by attempting to boot an image other than Windows? If so, we can consider adding a test along the lines of tests/acceptance/boot_linux_console.py. Thanks, - Cleber. > https://gitlab.com/hw-claudio/qemu/-/pipelines/314286751 > > C. > > >