On Thu, Jun 3, 2021 at 10:29 AM Claudio Fontana <cfont...@suse.de> wrote:

> On 6/3/21 2:29 PM, Claudio Fontana wrote:
> > v1 -> v2:
> >  * moved hyperv realizefn call before cpu expansion (Vitaly)
> >  * added more comments (Eduardo)
> >  * fixed references to commit ids (Eduardo)
> >
> > The combination of Commits:
> > f5cc5a5c ("i386: split cpu accelerators from cpu.c"...)
>
> > 30565f10 ("cpu: call AccelCPUClass::cpu_realizefn in"...)
> >
> > introduced two bugs that break cpu max and host in the refactoring,
> > by running initializations in the wrong order.
> >
> > This small series of two patches is an attempt to correct the situation.
> >
> > Please provide your test results and feedback, thanks!
> >
> > Claudio
> >
> > Claudio Fontana (2):
> >   i386: reorder call to cpu_exec_realizefn in x86_cpu_realizefn
> >   i386: run accel_cpu_instance_init as instance_post_init
> >
> >  target/i386/cpu.c         | 89 +++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
> >  target/i386/kvm/kvm-cpu.c | 12 +++++-
> >  2 files changed, 68 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
> >
>
> Btw, CI/CD is all green, but as mentioned, it does not seem to catch these
> kind of issues.
>
>
Hi Claudio,

Not familiar with the specifics of this bug, but can it be caught by
attempting to boot an image other than Windows?  If so, we can consider
adding a test along the lines of tests/acceptance/boot_linux_console.py.

Thanks,
- Cleber.


> https://gitlab.com/hw-claudio/qemu/-/pipelines/314286751
>
> C.
>
>
>

Reply via email to