From: Daniel P. Berrangé <berra...@redhat.com>

The condition being tested has never been set since the day the code was
first introduced.

Reviewed-by: Willian Rampazzo <willi...@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.hender...@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berra...@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210514120415.1368922-8-berra...@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <th...@redhat.com>
---
 crypto/tlscredsx509.c | 2 --
 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/crypto/tlscredsx509.c b/crypto/tlscredsx509.c
index bc503bab55..d9d6f4421e 100644
--- a/crypto/tlscredsx509.c
+++ b/crypto/tlscredsx509.c
@@ -354,11 +354,9 @@ qcrypto_tls_creds_check_cert_pair(gnutls_x509_crt_t cert,
             reason = "The certificate has been revoked";
         }
 
-#ifndef GNUTLS_1_0_COMPAT
         if (status & GNUTLS_CERT_INSECURE_ALGORITHM) {
             reason = "The certificate uses an insecure algorithm";
         }
-#endif
 
         error_setg(errp,
                    "Our own certificate %s failed validation against %s: %s",
-- 
2.27.0


Reply via email to