On 10/04/2011 01:35 PM, Juan Quintela wrote:
Anthony Liguori<anth...@codemonkey.ws> wrote:
On 09/23/2011 07:50 AM, Juan Quintela wrote:
make functions propaget errno, instead of just using -EIO.
Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela<quint...@redhat.com>
qemu_file_has_error() implies a boolean response. Wouldn't
qemu_file_get_error() make more sense if you're going to rely on the
return value?
I just didn't want to change more things on the same patch.
I can add a patch on top of this series?
It's terribly odd to make a function that looks like a bool return a non-boolean
value. It can't be that much of a change to do it in this patch, it's just a
matter of running sed.
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
Later, Juan.
