On 2011-10-04 19:01, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 10/04/2011 06:33 PM, Alex Williamson wrote:
>> I thought we were potentially looking at vfio as a convergence point.
>> I'm still a bit off from having a vfio re-write ready to submit, but is
>> this still a possibility?  Thanks,
>>
> 
> vfio leaves out users of current and past kernels; relying on it would
> force me to maintain qemu-kvm for a while.

VFIO is a great thing, and we all want it. But it's also a big project
now as it has to please more and more use cases. I think it will require
some more time to settle its interfaces, and it should likely take this
time. So we need KVM device assignment upstream as well until comparable
VFIO support is in every recent distro kernel out there.

Jan

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to