On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 10:43:57AM +0000, John Levon wrote: > On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 11:09:53AM +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: > > Fleshing out irqs sounds like a 1.0 milestone to me. It will definitely > > be necessary but for now this can be dropped. > > I could be wrong, and probably am, but I believe we're basically fine for IRQs > right now, until we want to support servers on separate hosts where we'll > obviously have to re-introduce something like the VM_INTERRUPT message.
Great! Stefan
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
