Claudio Fontana <cfont...@suse.de> writes:
> On 3/8/21 3:02 PM, Alex Bennée wrote:
>>
>> Claudio Fontana <cfont...@suse.de> writes:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> anything else for me to do here?
>>
>> It looks to me that this series is looking pretty good. Every patch has
>> at least one review so I think it's just waiting on the maintainers to
>> pick it up.
>>
>> Paolo/Richard - are you intending to take the series as is or are you
>> waiting for something else? I'd like to see the patch delta reduced for
>> the ARM cleanup work which is still ongoing.
>
> I am a bit at a loss here, as this has been reviewed for a while, but nothing
> is happening.
> Rebasing is starting to become more and more draining;
This is still the latest re-factor right?
Subject: [PATCH v28 00/23] i386 cleanup PART 2
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2021 14:27:36 +0100
Message-Id: <20210322132800.7470-1-cfont...@suse.de>
> I am seeing some changes from Phil that redo some of the patches here (like
> target arch user),
> maybe you would like to drive this?
AIUI his changes where to get qtest passing. I've just been chatting to
Paolo on IRC so I think we are almost ready to go.
> bonzini_: what's currently holding up getting Claudio's re-factoring
work merged?
> f4bug: also ^ - I'm a little worried we have splintering
re-factoring forks
*** First activity: f4bug joined 2 hours 8 minutes 6 seconds ago.
<f4bug> stsquad: the qtests series is pending imammedo review then
could go in
<f4bug> stsquad: which would simplify a bit Claudio's series (on
respin he could drop a pair of patches)
<f4bug> stsquad: my understanding was bonzini_ would merge the x86
series, then pm215 could merge the arm one on top
*** First activity: bonzini_ joined 1 hour 17 minutes 25 seconds ago.
<bonzini_> ok i can queue it in my next PR
<f4bug> the only blocking part is qtest not passing, but Claudio's
refactor series is not the culprit
<bonzini_> ok
--
Alex Bennée
