在 2021/4/27 下午2:40, Jason Wang 写道:
static int virtio_pci_vq_vector_unmask(VirtIOPCIProxy *proxy,
unsigned int queue_no,
unsigned int vector,
- MSIMessage msg)
+ MSIMessage msg,
+ EventNotifier *n)
So you switch to use EventNotifier but keep using queue_no/vector,
this looks kind of duplication.
If we can keep queue_no or virtio_queue_get_guest_notifier working as
in the past, I don't see any reason for this effort.
Ok I see it is because we need to support config interrupt.
But using queue_no/vector/n at the same time is a hint that the decouple
is not done completely.
Thanks
Thanks