On 27.09.2011, at 19:04, Richard Henderson wrote: > On 09/27/2011 10:01 AM, Alexander Graf wrote: >> 0xd >> 0xe >> 0xf >> >> ... and & 0x3 them >> >> 0x1 >> 0x2 >> 0x0 > > That's a remarkably different AND function...
No, it's a typo. I typed % instead of & and didn't realize it. Bleks. :) Alex
