On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 7:01 AM Viresh Kumar <viresh.ku...@linaro.org> wrote:
> On 25-03-21, 17:16, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 8:33 AM Viresh Kumar <viresh.ku...@linaro.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > +static uint8_t vi2c_xfer(VuDev *dev, struct i2c_msg *msg)
> > > +{
> > > + VuI2c *i2c = container_of(dev, VuI2c, dev.parent);
> > > + struct i2c_rdwr_ioctl_data data;
> > > + VI2cAdapter *adapter;
> > > +
> > > + adapter = vi2c_find_adapter(i2c, msg->addr);
> > > + if (!adapter) {
> > > + g_printerr("Failed to find adapter for address: %x\n",
> > > msg->addr);
> > > + return VIRTIO_I2C_MSG_ERR;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + data.nmsgs = 1;
> > > + data.msgs = msg;
> > > +
> > > + if (ioctl(adapter->fd, I2C_RDWR, &data) < 0) {
> > > + g_printerr("Failed to transfer data to address %x : %d\n",
> > > msg->addr, errno);
> > > + return VIRTIO_I2C_MSG_ERR;
> > > + }
> >
> > As you found during testing, this doesn't work for host kernels
> > that only implement the SMBUS protocol. Since most i2c clients
> > only need simple register read/write operations, I think you should
> > at least handle the common ones (and one two byte read/write)
> > here to make it more useful.
>
> I am thinking if that is what we really want to support, then
> shouldn't the i2c virtio spec be updated first to support SMBUS type
> transfers as well?
As far as I can tell, all the simple devices should just work, with
I2C_FUNC_SMBUS_READ_BLOCK_DATA being the main exception,
but it seems that has practically no users.
Arnd
