Hi On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 10:23 PM John Snow <js...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 3/22/21 12:36 PM, Peter Maydell wrote: > > On Mon, 22 Mar 2021 at 16:03, <marcandre.lur...@redhat.com> wrote: > >> > >> From: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lur...@redhat.com> > >> > >> Now that we merged into one doc, it makes the nav looks nicer. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lur...@redhat.com> > >> --- > >> docs/devel/index.rst | 4 ++-- > >> docs/interop/index.rst | 4 ++-- > >> docs/specs/index.rst | 4 ++-- > >> docs/system/index.rst | 4 ++-- > >> docs/tools/index.rst | 4 ++-- > >> docs/user/index.rst | 4 ++-- > >> 6 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) > >> > >> diff --git a/docs/devel/index.rst b/docs/devel/index.rst > >> index 7c424ea6d7..09d21d3514 100644 > >> --- a/docs/devel/index.rst > >> +++ b/docs/devel/index.rst > >> @@ -1,8 +1,8 @@ > >> .. This is the top level page for the 'devel' manual. > >> > >> > >> -QEMU Developer's Guide > >> -====================== > >> +Developers > >> +========== > > > > I think this should be "Developer's Guide" or "Developer Information" > > or something. Just "Developers" doesn't really read right to me: > > it is not "documentation of developers" in the way that the "Tools" > > section is "documentation of tools", etc. > > > > thanks > > -- PMM > > > > Changing it to a verb - "Development" - might fit the intent, by analogy > with "System Emulation Management and Interoperability", "System > Emulation", and "User Mode Emulation". > > Keeping it as a noun with "Developer Information" or "Information for > Developers" also reads fine to me. > > It's a collection of developer's documents regrouped in a section. Maybe we should consider a title like "Internals" instead? Tbh, I think "Developers" was about right too.. "Guide" does not uphold its promise. Ok, last call for "Developer Information" ? -- Marc-André Lureau
