On 3/13/21 1:05 PM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> Incorrect subject prefix, should be "hw/ssi/aspeed_smc"

Is this just good practice or something that was agreed upon ? 
We should update checkpatch if so.

Thanks,

C. 


> 
> On 3/12/21 7:28 PM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
>> The flash mmio region is exposed as an AddressSpace.
>> AddressSpaces must not be sysbus-mapped, therefore map
>> the region using an alias.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4...@amsat.org>
>> ---
>>  include/hw/ssi/aspeed_smc.h | 1 +
>>  hw/ssi/aspeed_smc.c         | 4 +++-
>>  2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/hw/ssi/aspeed_smc.h b/include/hw/ssi/aspeed_smc.h
>> index 16c03fe64f3..e3c96cecbd8 100644
>> --- a/include/hw/ssi/aspeed_smc.h
>> +++ b/include/hw/ssi/aspeed_smc.h
>> @@ -84,6 +84,7 @@ struct AspeedSMCState {
>>  
>>      MemoryRegion mmio;
>>      MemoryRegion mmio_flash;
>> +    MemoryRegion mmio_flash_alias;
>>  
>>      qemu_irq irq;
>>      int irqline;
>> diff --git a/hw/ssi/aspeed_smc.c b/hw/ssi/aspeed_smc.c
>> index 16addee4dc8..aa26578bdac 100644
>> --- a/hw/ssi/aspeed_smc.c
>> +++ b/hw/ssi/aspeed_smc.c
>> @@ -1386,7 +1386,9 @@ static void aspeed_smc_realize(DeviceState *dev, Error 
>> **errp)
>>      memory_region_init_io(&s->mmio_flash, OBJECT(s),
>>                            &aspeed_smc_flash_default_ops, s, name,
>>                            s->ctrl->flash_window_size);
>> -    sysbus_init_mmio(sbd, &s->mmio_flash);
>> +    memory_region_init_alias(&s->mmio_flash_alias, OBJECT(s), name,
>> +                             &s->mmio_flash, 0, s->ctrl->flash_window_size);
>> +    sysbus_init_mmio(sbd, &s->mmio_flash_alias);
>>  
>>      s->flashes = g_new0(AspeedSMCFlash, s->ctrl->max_peripherals);


Reply via email to