* Gerd Hoffmann (kra...@redhat.com) wrote: > On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 05:21:02PM +0000, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote: > > Hi, > > I've got a half-baked idea, which I thought might be worth mentioning. > > > > How hard would it be to give qemu a usbredir server rather than client? > > The usb part is probably not that hard. The devices are not standalone > though. Tricky is the integration with the rest of qemu, with the input > subsystem (hid devices), chardevs (usb-serial), network (usb-net), sound > (usb-audio), block (usb-storage), ...
As long as this was still the qemu binary would that be a problem? > ccid and u2f are probably easierst. > mtp should not be hard too. > maybe storage when limiting support to storage daemon. > then it'll be tricky. > maybe the multi-process qemu effort solves (some of) these problems. It doesn't handle remote does it? Dave > take care, > Gerd > -- Dr. David Alan Gilbert / dgilb...@redhat.com / Manchester, UK