On 2011-09-18 17:51, Avi Kivity wrote: > On 09/18/2011 03:44 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote: >> From: Jan Kiszka<jan.kis...@siemens.com> >> >> Fix copy&paste errors and reduce duplications of the BOCHS VBE ranges. >> >> Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka<jan.kis...@siemens.com> >> --- >> >> #ifdef CONFIG_BOCHS_VBE >> static const MemoryRegionPortio vbe_portio_list[] = { >> -# ifdef TARGET_I386 >> { 0, 1, 2, .read = vbe_ioport_read_index, .write = >> vbe_ioport_write_index }, >> +# ifdef TARGET_I386 > > Strange how the card knows what target it's plugged into. Fixing this > is going to involve major pain - need to update the bios and need to > provide backwards compatibility. All this assuming guests don't > hardcode the address. > > Anyway I find the deduplication makes the code harder to read.
That line is rather tricky to deduplicate in mind. So it's not nice for our readers keeping it duplicated around. > >> { 1, 1, 2, .read = vbe_ioport_read_data, .write = >> vbe_ioport_write_data }, >> # else >> - { 0, 2, 2, .read = vbe_ioport_read_index, .write = >> vbe_ioport_write_index }, >> - { 2, 2, 2, .read = vbe_ioport_read_data, .write = >> vbe_ioport_write_data }, >> + { 2, 1, 2, .read = vbe_ioport_read_data, .write = >> vbe_ioport_write_data }, > > Is this correct? length 1 region with size 2? Yes, it prevents accesses on base+1. Jan
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature