On 3/10/21 2:27 PM, Alex Bennée wrote: > > Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org> writes: > >> On Wed, 10 Mar 2021 at 10:44, Alex Bennée <alex.ben...@linaro.org> wrote: >>> And then I get the same failure as you. Can you confirm the docker >>> version you have now? >> >> e104462:bionic:qemu$ docker version >> Client: >> Version: 18.09.1 >> API version: 1.39 >> Go version: go1.10.6 >> Git commit: 4c52b90 >> Built: Wed Jan 9 19:35:23 2019 >> OS/Arch: linux/amd64 >> Experimental: false >> >> Server: Docker Engine - Community >> Engine: >> Version: 18.09.1 >> API version: 1.39 (minimum version 1.12) >> Go version: go1.10.6 >> Git commit: 4c52b90 >> Built: Wed Jan 9 19:02:44 2019 >> OS/Arch: linux/amd64 >> Experimental: false > > I swapped out the snap docker for the docker.io package from the > repository but it's still a newer version than yours: > > 13:25 alex@bionic/x86_64 [user.static/testing/next] >docker version > Client: > Version: 19.03.6 > API version: 1.40 > Go version: go1.12.17 > Git commit: 369ce74a3c > Built: Fri Dec 18 12:21:44 2020 > OS/Arch: linux/amd64 > Experimental: false > > Server: > Engine: > Version: 19.03.6 > API version: 1.40 (minimum version 1.12) > Go version: go1.12.17 > Git commit: 369ce74a3c > Built: Thu Dec 10 13:23:49 2020 > OS/Arch: linux/amd64 > Experimental: false > containerd: > Version: 1.3.3-0ubuntu1~18.04.4 > GitCommit: > runc: > Version: spec: 1.0.1-dev > GitCommit: > docker-init: > Version: 0.18.0 > GitCommit: > > So I guess somehow we've regressed something that doesn't work on the > older version on your system. I can't recreate anything like your > failure unless I switch to the snap version (which I think is related to > visibility of file-systems from the snap) so perhaps we just need to > detect that somehow and disable docker support?
Why is Peter's Docker trying to rebuild the downloaded image? Is it something the docker.py script is doing (like final step) that invalidate the cache? Peter, just to remove one variable from the equation, your system RTC is correct? Alex, why not simply remove the 2 Hexagon patches from your pullreq until we figure this out? Phil.
