On 03/03/2021 19.22, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
We already have the 'run' variable holding 'cs->kvm_run' value.

Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <phi...@redhat.com>
---
  target/s390x/kvm.c | 3 +--
  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/target/s390x/kvm.c b/target/s390x/kvm.c
index 7a892d663df..73f816a7222 100644
--- a/target/s390x/kvm.c
+++ b/target/s390x/kvm.c
@@ -1785,8 +1785,7 @@ static int handle_intercept(S390CPU *cpu)
      int icpt_code = run->s390_sieic.icptcode;
      int r = 0;
- DPRINTF("intercept: 0x%x (at 0x%lx)\n", icpt_code,
-            (long)cs->kvm_run->psw_addr);
+    DPRINTF("intercept: 0x%x (at 0x%lx)\n", icpt_code, (long)run->psw_addr);
      switch (icpt_code) {
          case ICPT_INSTRUCTION:
          case ICPT_PV_INSTR:


Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <th...@redhat.com>


Reply via email to