On Sep 15, 2011, at 4:42 AM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: > On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 6:35 PM, Sinha, Ani <ani.si...@tellabs.com> wrote: >> Makes sense? > > I'm still not sure what the point of multiplexing host IPMI into > guests is. The guest should not be able to power off the host. It > shouldn't be able to mess with the watchdog timer. It may wish to > read sensors but do they even make sense to a guest with virtual > hardware?
Those are valid concerns :) However, I do not know how the other teams of this project will make use of this paravirtualized device. My team is supposed to only make this device available in the guest with certain features functional (like sending raw requests and receiving responses). May be later if I get more visibility, I will let you know. Ani ============================================================ The information contained in this message may be privileged and confidential and protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any reproduction, dissemination or distribution of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting it from your computer. Thank you. Tellabs ============================================================
