Hi Keith,
On 2/8/21 4:54 PM, Keith Busch wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 08, 2021 at 10:20:51AM +0100, Klaus Jensen wrote:
>> On Feb 8 10:03, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
>>> Hi Dmitry, Klaus.
>>>
>>> On 2/8/21 1:32 AM, Dmitry Fomichev wrote:
>>>> Implicitly and Explicitly Open zones can be closed by Close Zone
>>>> management function. This got broken by a recent commit and now such
>>>> commands fail with Invalid Zone State Transition status.
>>>>
>>>> Modify nvm_zrm_close() function to make Close Zone work correctly.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Fomichev <dmitry.fomic...@wdc.com>
>>>> Fixes: 053b5a302c3("hw/block/nvme: refactor zone resource management")
>>>
>>> '053b5a302c3': unknown revision or path not in the working tree.
>>>
>>> If you point at an unmerged commit, why not fix it directly
>>> before merging?
>>>
>>
>> Dmitry, you OK with me squashing this fix and appending
>>
>> [dmitry: fix broken Close Zone]
>> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Fomichev <dmitry.fomic...@wdc.com>
>>
>> to the commit message?
>
> IMO, we should avoid the habit of rebasing and force pushes on staging
> trees once they're public.
Well I had not information this patch was targeting another tree.
If you don't want to send regular pull request, it would be useful
to ask the NVMe contributors to provide an information on which
tree their patch is based.
Regards,
Phil.
