On Thu, 21 Jan 2021 17:35:53 +0000
"Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilb...@redhat.com> wrote:

> * Greg Kurz (gr...@kaod.org) wrote:
> > This is how glibc implements lseek(2) on POWER.
> > 
> > BugLink: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1917692
> > Signed-off-by: Greg Kurz <gr...@kaod.org>
> 
> OK, I'm going to assume that _llseek is present on pretty much
> everything?
> 

I've only manually checked it is present on fedora x86,
but this patch successfully passed gitlab CI and travis
before being posted.

> Reviewed-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilb...@redhat.com>
> 
> > ---
> >  tools/virtiofsd/passthrough_seccomp.c | 1 +
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/tools/virtiofsd/passthrough_seccomp.c 
> > b/tools/virtiofsd/passthrough_seccomp.c
> > index a60d7da4b4e2..1ecf5bf318b3 100644
> > --- a/tools/virtiofsd/passthrough_seccomp.c
> > +++ b/tools/virtiofsd/passthrough_seccomp.c
> > @@ -65,6 +65,7 @@ static const int syscall_whitelist[] = {
> >      SCMP_SYS(linkat),
> >      SCMP_SYS(listxattr),
> >      SCMP_SYS(lseek),
> > +    SCMP_SYS(_llseek), /* For POWER */
> >      SCMP_SYS(madvise),
> >      SCMP_SYS(mkdirat),
> >      SCMP_SYS(mknodat),
> > -- 
> > 2.26.2
> > 


Reply via email to