On Thu, 21 Jan 2021 17:35:53 +0000 "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilb...@redhat.com> wrote:
> * Greg Kurz (gr...@kaod.org) wrote: > > This is how glibc implements lseek(2) on POWER. > > > > BugLink: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1917692 > > Signed-off-by: Greg Kurz <gr...@kaod.org> > > OK, I'm going to assume that _llseek is present on pretty much > everything? > I've only manually checked it is present on fedora x86, but this patch successfully passed gitlab CI and travis before being posted. > Reviewed-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilb...@redhat.com> > > > --- > > tools/virtiofsd/passthrough_seccomp.c | 1 + > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > > > diff --git a/tools/virtiofsd/passthrough_seccomp.c > > b/tools/virtiofsd/passthrough_seccomp.c > > index a60d7da4b4e2..1ecf5bf318b3 100644 > > --- a/tools/virtiofsd/passthrough_seccomp.c > > +++ b/tools/virtiofsd/passthrough_seccomp.c > > @@ -65,6 +65,7 @@ static const int syscall_whitelist[] = { > > SCMP_SYS(linkat), > > SCMP_SYS(listxattr), > > SCMP_SYS(lseek), > > + SCMP_SYS(_llseek), /* For POWER */ > > SCMP_SYS(madvise), > > SCMP_SYS(mkdirat), > > SCMP_SYS(mknodat), > > -- > > 2.26.2 > >