On 21/01/21 10:27, Max Reitz wrote:
Sure, I can do that.
I agree that there probably are better solutions than to wrap everything
in a lock. OTOH, it looks to me like this lock is the most simple
solution. If Daniel is right[1] and we should drop
coroutine-sigaltstack altogether (at some point...), perhaps it is best
to go for the most simple solution now.
[1]
https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-block/2021-01/msg00808.html
Yes, between coroutine-ucontext and the upcoming coroutine-asm[1] (which
I have shelved because it was mostly a requirement for x86 CET; but it
will come back some day), sooner or later there will be no reason to
keep coroutine-sigaltstack. Porting coroutine-asm to a new architecture
is easy, I even managed to do it for s390. ;)
Paolo
[1] https://patchew.org/QEMU/20190504120528.6389-1-pbonz...@redhat.com/
