On 1/13/21 3:12 AM, Rémi Denis-Courmont wrote:
>>     if (arm_dc_feature(s, ARM_FEATURE_AARCH64) &&
>>         dc_isar_feature(aa64_sel2, s)) {
>>         ...
>>
> 
> Hmm, yeah. Should this be an ifdef on TARGET_AARCH64 instead?

No, I don't think so.  It's not performance critical that we avoid a single bit
test.

> Also do we need to revector the exception code, or leave it mostly duplicated 
> as is?

If you see a way to tidy that, great, please.  But I don't think it's required
for this patch set.


r~

Reply via email to