On 1/13/21 3:12 AM, Rémi Denis-Courmont wrote: >> if (arm_dc_feature(s, ARM_FEATURE_AARCH64) && >> dc_isar_feature(aa64_sel2, s)) { >> ... >> > > Hmm, yeah. Should this be an ifdef on TARGET_AARCH64 instead?
No, I don't think so. It's not performance critical that we avoid a single bit test. > Also do we need to revector the exception code, or leave it mostly duplicated > as is? If you see a way to tidy that, great, please. But I don't think it's required for this patch set. r~