On 1/1/21 7:05 PM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: > On 12/24/20 4:17 AM, Jiaxun Yang wrote: >> modetty is not handled by kernel and the parameter >> here seems unreasonable. >> >> Signed-off-by: Jiaxun Yang <jiaxun.y...@flygoat.com> >> --- >> v3: Bring busclock back >> --- >> hw/mips/fuloong2e.c | 2 -- >> 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/hw/mips/fuloong2e.c b/hw/mips/fuloong2e.c >> index d846ef7b00..c4843dd15e 100644 >> --- a/hw/mips/fuloong2e.c >> +++ b/hw/mips/fuloong2e.c >> @@ -159,10 +159,8 @@ static uint64_t load_kernel(CPUMIPSState *env) >> } >> >> /* Setup minimum environment variables */ >> - prom_set(prom_buf, index++, "busclock=33000000");
Ah but you still removed busclock... This might explain why. >> prom_set(prom_buf, index++, "cpuclock=100000000"); >> prom_set(prom_buf, index++, "memsize=%"PRIi64, loaderparams.ram_size / >> MiB); >> - prom_set(prom_buf, index++, "modetty0=38400n8r"); >> prom_set(prom_buf, index++, NULL); > > This makes my Linux kernel 2.6 test behave oddly: > > (4/4) > tests/acceptance/machine_mips_fuloong2e.py:MipsFuloong2e.test_linux_kernel_isa_serial: > console: Linux version 2.6.27.7lemote (root@debian) (gcc version 4.1.3 > 20080623 (prerelease) (Debian 4.1.2-23)) #6 Fri Dec 12 00:11:25 CST 2008 > console: busclock=0, cpuclock=-2145008360,memsize=256,highmemsize=0 > console: console [early0] enabled > console: CPU revision is: 00006302 (ICT Loongson-2) >
