On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 11:24:46AM +0000, Peter Maydell wrote: > On Thu, 10 Dec 2020 at 11:14, Stefan Hajnoczi <stefa...@redhat.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 03, 2020 at 08:40:11PM +0000, Peter Maydell wrote: > > > I would prefer to see this going through the tree of an > > > established QEMU developer who's already sending pullrequests, > > > at least initially. > > > > Once the discussion has completed I can send the patches in a pull > > request. > > > > I don't want to be the bottleneck for all multi-process QEMU patches in > > the future though. That's why I think the authors should be able to send > > pull requests on their own after the initial code is merged. Much of > > this work is isolated an only affects multi-process QEMU and the feature > > is marked experimental. There is little risk of introducing instability > > for non-multi-process QEMU users/developers. Hence why this is a new > > subsystem and has MAINTAINERS files entries. > > My reasoning is basically that new pull-request senders are more > work for me, because I have to make sure they have a GPG key set > up, and then examine pull requests pretty carefully to check they're > well-formed, all the sign-offs are correct, the changes aren't > touching areas of the codebase that they shouldn't, and so on. > That's particularly painful if the first pull request that comes > through is a massive one rather than "here's a small number of > patches with some bug fixes".
Thanks for explaining. I will merge this series when review has finished and send you a pull request. Stefan
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
