On Wed, 31 Aug 2011, Anthony Liguori wrote: > On 08/31/2011 08:17 AM, malc wrote: > > On Tue, 30 Aug 2011, Anthony Liguori wrote: > > > > > On 08/30/2011 08:30 PM, malc wrote: > > > > On Tue, 30 Aug 2011, Anthony Liguori wrote: > > > > > > > > > This won't even come close to passing checkpatch.pl > > > > > > > > Have you actually tried? > > > > > > Sigh. I was hoping checkpatch.pl was more useful than it appears to be. > > > > > > At any rate, the patch doesn't follow CODING_STYLE. > > > > > > > Where? > > 3. Naming > > Variables are lower_case_with_underscores; easy to type and read. Structured > type names are in CamelCase; harder to type but standing out. Scalar type > names are lower_case_with_underscores_ending_with_a_t, like the POSIX > uint64_t and family. Note that this last convention contradicts POSIX > and is therefore likely to be changed.
Where in the patch this was violated, and do note that fields are not variables. > > When wrapping standard library functions, use the prefix qemu_ to alert > readers that they are seeing a wrapped version; otherwise avoid this prefix. And what ^^^ has to do with anything? > > Regards, > > Anthony Liguori > > > > [..snip..] > > > -- mailto:av1...@comtv.ru
