Hi all!
I have a coredump of our qemu branch, based on rhev-2.12.0-44.el7_8.2,
which in turn is based on v2.12.0.. And don't have any kind of
reproduce.
The backtrace:
#0 aio_co_schedule (ctx=0x0, co=0x55dd539fa340) at util/async.c:455
#1 0x000055dd51149716 in aio_co_enter (ctx=<optimized out>, co=<optimized
out>) at util/async.c:476
#2 0x000055dd511497bc in aio_co_wake (co=<optimized out>) at
util/async.c:470
#3 0x000055dd5115ea43 in qemu_co_mutex_wake (mutex=0x55dd539c36b0,
co=<optimized out>) at util/qemu-coroutine-lock.c:197
#4 qemu_co_mutex_unlock (mutex=mutex@entry=0x55dd539c36b0) at
util/qemu-coroutine-lock.c:300
#5 0x000055dd5109f4e0 in qcow2_co_pwritev_cluster_compressed
(qiov=0x7fcbbc972a70, bytes=65536, offset=17582325760, bs=0x55dd539fe000) at
block/qcow2.c:4360
#6 qcow2_co_pwritev_compressed (bs=0x55dd539fe000, offset=17582325760,
bytes=65536, qiov=0x7fcbbc972de0) at block/qcow2.c:4425
#7 0x000055dd510d5cd2 in bdrv_driver_pwritev_compressed
(qiov=0x7fcbbc972de0, bytes=65536, offset=17582325760, bs=0x55dd539fe000) at
block/io.c:1227
#8 bdrv_aligned_pwritev (req=req@entry=0x7fcbbc972c60,
offset=offset@entry=17582325760, bytes=bytes@entry=65536, align=align@entry=1,
qiov=qiov@entry=0x7fcbbc972de0, flags=flags@entry=32, child=0x55dd539cea80,
child=0x55dd539cea80) at block/io.c:1850
#9 0x000055dd510d6369 in bdrv_co_pwritev (child=0x55dd539cea80,
offset=offset@entry=17582325760, bytes=bytes@entry=65536,
qiov=qiov@entry=0x7fcbbc972de0, flags=BDRV_REQ_WRITE_COMPRESSED) at
block/io.c:2144
#10 0x000055dd510c3644 in blk_co_pwritev (blk=0x55dd539fc300,
offset=17582325760, bytes=65536, qiov=0x7fcbbc972de0, flags=<optimized out>) at
block/block-backend.c:1237
#11 0x000055dd510c372c in blk_write_entry (opaque=0x7fcbbc972e00) at
block/block-backend.c:1264
#12 0x000055dd510c1e18 in blk_prw (blk=0x55dd539fc300, offset=17582325760,
buf=buf@entry=0x55dd54a38000 "", bytes=bytes@entry=65536,
co_entry=co_entry@entry=0x55dd510c3710 <blk_write_entry>,
flags=BDRV_REQ_WRITE_COMPRESSED) at block/block-backend.c:1292
#13 0x000055dd510c2f45 in blk_pwrite (blk=<optimized out>,
offset=<optimized out>, buf=buf@entry=0x55dd54a38000, count=count@entry=65536,
flags=<optimized out>) at block/block-backend.c:1486
#14 0x000055dd510ef949 in nbd_handle_request (errp=0x7fcbbc972ef8,
data=0x55dd54a38000 "", request=<synthetic pointer>, client=0x55dd539ee420) at
nbd/server.c:2264
#15 nbd_trip (opaque=0x55dd539ee420) at nbd/server.c:2393
#16 0x000055dd5115f72a in coroutine_trampoline (i0=<optimized out>,
i1=<optimized out>) at util/coroutine-ucontext.c:116
#17 0x00007fcbc5422190 in ?? () from
/work/crash-bugs/PSBM-123528/ccpp-2020-12-08-00_59_06-418945/root/lib64/libc.so.6
#18 0x00007fcbbca736d0 in ?? ()
#19 0x0000000000000000 in ?? ()
Backtrace stopped: Cannot access memory at address 0x7fcbbc973000
(gdb) p *co
$1 = {entry = 0x0, entry_arg = 0x0, caller = 0x0, pool_next = {sle_next =
0x0}, locks_held = 0, ctx = 0x0, scheduled = 0x55dd51195660 <__func__.23793>
"aio_co_schedule", co_queue_next = {sqe_next = 0x0},
co_queue_wakeup = {sqh_first = 0x0, sqh_last = 0x55dd539f5680},
co_scheduled_next = {sle_next = 0x0}}
So, it looks like we want to wake up a coroutine on co-mutex unlock,
but the coroutine is already exited..
I had no idea what how to debug it, and decided to add some assertions,
to make sure that coroutine waiting on mutex is entered through
qemu_co_mutex_unlock, see the patch below.
Still, when I run make check with this patch applied, I faced a crash
in ./tests/test-aio-multithread, my assertion fails:
test-aio-multithread: ../util/qemu-coroutine-lock.c:197: qemu_co_mutex_wake:
Assertion `mutex == co->wait_on_mutex' failed.
Thread 18 "test-aio-multit" received signal SIGABRT, Aborted.
[Switching to Thread 0x7fffe5ffb700 (LWP 24549)]
0x00007ffff7063625 in raise () from /lib64/libc.so.6
(gdb) bt
#0 0x00007ffff7063625 in raise () from /lib64/libc.so.6
#1 0x00007ffff704c8d9 in abort () from /lib64/libc.so.6
#2 0x00007ffff704c7a9 in __assert_fail_base.cold () from /lib64/libc.so.6
#3 0x00007ffff705ba66 in __assert_fail () from /lib64/libc.so.6
#4 0x000055555568c153 in qemu_co_mutex_wake (mutex=0x555555771360
<comutex>, co=0x555555803ec0) at ../util/qemu-coroutine-lock.c:197
#5 0x000055555568c5a0 in qemu_co_mutex_unlock (mutex=0x555555771360
<comutex>) at ../util/qemu-coroutine-lock.c:307
#6 0x000055555557acfd in test_multi_co_mutex_entry (opaque=0x0) at
../tests/test-aio-multithread.c:208
#7 0x00005555556bb5d7 in coroutine_trampoline (i0=1434467712, i1=21845) at
../util/coroutine-ucontext.c:173
#8 0x00007ffff7078d30 in ?? () from /lib64/libc.so.6
#9 0x00007fffffffd850 in ?? ()
#10 0x0000000000000000 in ?? ()
(gdb) fr 4
#4 0x000055555568c153 in qemu_co_mutex_wake (mutex=0x555555771360
<comutex>, co=0x555555803ec0) at ../util/qemu-coroutine-lock.c:197
197 assert(mutex == co->wait_on_mutex);
(gdb) p mutex
$1 = (CoMutex *) 0x555555771360 <comutex>
(gdb) p co->wait_on_mutex
$2 = (CoMutex *) 0x555555771360 <comutex>
(gdb) p mutex == co->wait_on_mutex
$3 = 1
So, it failed, but in gdb the condition is true.. How can that be?
Does it mean, that assertion crashed prior to set "self->wait_on_mutex =
mutex;"?
But then, we do wake-up a coroutine prior to qemu_coroutine_yield() in
it, is it correct?
Or do I need some kind of barrier/atomic-access to make
co->wait_on_mutex work?
Hmm, if I move self->wait_on_mutex = mutex before push_waiter:
diff --git a/util/qemu-coroutine-lock.c b/util/qemu-coroutine-lock.c
index 8af3e70343..a38d5e4bf7 100644
--- a/util/qemu-coroutine-lock.c
+++ b/util/qemu-coroutine-lock.c
@@ -208,6 +208,7 @@ static void coroutine_fn
qemu_co_mutex_lock_slowpath(AioContext *ctx,
trace_qemu_co_mutex_lock_entry(mutex, self);
w.co = self;
+ self->wait_on_mutex = mutex;
push_waiter(mutex, &w);
/* This is the "Responsibility Hand-Off" protocol; a lock() picks from
@@ -227,13 +228,13 @@ static void coroutine_fn
qemu_co_mutex_lock_slowpath(AioContext *ctx,
assert(to_wake == &w);
mutex->ctx = ctx;
mutex->holder = self;
+ self->wait_on_mutex = NULL;
return;
}
qemu_co_mutex_wake(mutex, co);
}
- self->wait_on_mutex = mutex;
qemu_coroutine_yield();
assert(mutex->holder == self); /* set by qemu_co_mutex_wake() */
trace_qemu_co_mutex_lock_return(mutex, self);
Than it doesn't crash.
But still.. if in parallel thread qemu_co_mutex_wake() may happen
during qemu_co_mutex_lock_slowpath() before qemu_coroutine_yield()
it seems bad.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsement...@virtuozzo.com>
---
include/qemu/coroutine_int.h | 1 +
util/qemu-coroutine-lock.c | 10 +++++++++-
util/qemu-coroutine.c | 6 ++++++
3 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/include/qemu/coroutine_int.h b/include/qemu/coroutine_int.h
index 1da148552f..1fd21b4437 100644
--- a/include/qemu/coroutine_int.h
+++ b/include/qemu/coroutine_int.h
@@ -49,6 +49,7 @@ struct Coroutine {
/* Only used when the coroutine has terminated. */
QSLIST_ENTRY(Coroutine) pool_next;
+ CoMutex *wait_on_mutex;
size_t locks_held;
/* Only used when the coroutine has yielded. */
diff --git a/util/qemu-coroutine-lock.c b/util/qemu-coroutine-lock.c
index 5816bf8900..8af3e70343 100644
--- a/util/qemu-coroutine-lock.c
+++ b/util/qemu-coroutine-lock.c
@@ -193,6 +193,9 @@ static void coroutine_fn qemu_co_mutex_wake(CoMutex *mutex,
Coroutine *co)
*/
smp_read_barrier_depends();
mutex->ctx = co->ctx;
+ mutex->holder = co;
+ assert(mutex == co->wait_on_mutex);
+ co->wait_on_mutex = NULL; /* asserted in qemu_coroutine_enter */
aio_co_wake(co);
}
@@ -223,13 +226,16 @@ static void coroutine_fn
qemu_co_mutex_lock_slowpath(AioContext *ctx,
/* We got the lock ourselves! */
assert(to_wake == &w);
mutex->ctx = ctx;
+ mutex->holder = self;
return;
}
qemu_co_mutex_wake(mutex, co);
}
+ self->wait_on_mutex = mutex;
qemu_coroutine_yield();
+ assert(mutex->holder == self); /* set by qemu_co_mutex_wake() */
trace_qemu_co_mutex_lock_return(mutex, self);
}
@@ -266,10 +272,12 @@ retry_fast_path:
/* Uncontended. */
trace_qemu_co_mutex_lock_uncontended(mutex, self);
mutex->ctx = ctx;
+ mutex->holder = self;
} else {
qemu_co_mutex_lock_slowpath(ctx, mutex);
+ assert(mutex->ctx == ctx);
+ assert(mutex->holder == self);
}
- mutex->holder = self;
self->locks_held++;
}
diff --git a/util/qemu-coroutine.c b/util/qemu-coroutine.c
index 38fb6d3084..6c75a8fe41 100644
--- a/util/qemu-coroutine.c
+++ b/util/qemu-coroutine.c
@@ -136,6 +136,12 @@ void qemu_aio_coroutine_enter(AioContext *ctx, Coroutine
*co)
abort();
}
+ if (to->wait_on_mutex) {
+ fprintf(stderr, "Co-routine waiting on mutex is entered not by "
+ "qemu_co_mutex_wake()\n");
+ abort();
+ }
+
to->caller = from;
to->ctx = ctx;
--
2.25.4
