----- Original Message -----
> On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 03:43:48PM +0800, Amos Kong wrote:
> > vhost_dev_stop() and vhost_dev_disable_notifiers() are called in
> > vhost_net_stop(), correct this comment.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Amos Kong <ak...@redhat.com>
> > ---
> >  hw/vhost.c | 2 +-
> >  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/hw/vhost.c b/hw/vhost.c
> > index 0870cb7..640aff0 100644
> > --- a/hw/vhost.c
> > +++ b/hw/vhost.c
> > @@ -797,7 +797,7 @@ fail:
> >      return r;
> >  }
> >
> > -/* Host notifiers must be enabled at this point. */
> > +/* Host notifiers must be disabled at this point. */
> >  void vhost_dev_stop(struct vhost_dev *hdev, VirtIODevice *vdev)
> >  {
> >      int i, r;
> 
> Well it looks like we first call vhost_dev_stop and
> only afterwards vhost_dev_disable_notifiers.
> So when vhost_dev_stop is called notifiers are enabled,
> and they really must be otherwise stuff will fail.
> Isn't this what the original comment says?
> If that's not clear, what would be a better wording?

It's my fault to misunderstand the meaning, we can ignore this patch.

Thanks,
Amos

Reply via email to