On 2011-08-29 21:23, Anthony Liguori wrote: > On 08/26/2011 09:48 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote: >> In order to address devices for that the user forgot or is even unable >> (no_user) to provide an ID, assign an automatically generated one. Such >> IDs have the format #<number>, thus are outside the name space availing >> to users. Don't use them for bus naming to avoid any other user-visible >> change. > > I don't think this is a very nice approach. Why not eliminate anonymous > devices entirely and use a parent derived name for devices that are not > created by the user?
This eliminates anonymous devices completely. So I guess you are asking for a different naming scheme, something like <parent-id>.child#<no> e.g.? Well, we would end up with fairly long names when a complete hierarchy is anonymous. What would be the benefit? I'm really just looking for some simple, temporary workaround without touching the existing fragile naming scheme. What we really need is full path addressing, but that without preserving all the legacy. Jan
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
