On Thu, Nov 26, 2020 at 05:34:50PM +0100, Antoine Damhet wrote: > On Thu, Nov 26, 2020 at 08:29:41AM -0500, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 26, 2020 at 01:50:12PM +0100, Antoine Damhet wrote: > > > On Thu, Nov 26, 2020 at 06:09:11AM -0500, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > > On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 09:13:22PM +0100, Antoine Damhet wrote: > > > > > On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 11:04:55AM -0500, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 01:32:51PM +0000, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > > > > > > On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 02:27:11PM +0100, Antoine Damhet wrote: > > [...] > > > Exactly so I ask myself whether it's worth it, their next version > > will check CPUID and then where are we? > > Then I guess they will have to admit that they are purposefully blocking > VM use and it's not our problem anymore. > > > But maybe it's time we just changed all these IDs to e.g. QEMU. > > We are very far from bochs generated tables by now. > > That's a good idea, but I still think they should be user override-able > (unless you think it would be a heavy maintenance burden, in that case > you are king in your castle :D ) > > > Question is will this cause annoyances with e.g. windows guests? > > Windows 10 guests seems unaffected, I cannot say for the other > versions/servers editions.
unaffected yes, but what about things like reactivation, warning about system changes at boot or reinstalling drivers? changing acpi significantly does this sometimes ... > > Igor what's your experience with this? > > [...] > > -- > Antoine 'xdbob' Damhet
