On Mon, Nov 02, 2020 at 07:54:14PM +0000, Peter Maydell wrote:
> Currently QEMU's Coverity-Scan project has a bunch of unresolved
> issues in code in dtc/ and also in slirp/. (I suspect most of them
> are actually false-positives that got re-reported when we switched
> to Meson and the filenames changed, or some similar event.)
> 
> Do dtc and slirp as upstream projects already track Coverity issues
> (in which case we can just close the issues in the QEMU tracker as
> irrelevant, or do we need to investigate these and potentially
> forward them into whatever upstream bug tracker is appropriate?

dtc is wired up to coverity_scan, and quite a few of the things it
caught were fixed a while back.  I must admit I don't re-examine the
remaining warnings very frequently though.  I *think* what's still
there are false positives, but I'm not super confident about that.

-- 
David Gibson                    | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au  | minimalist, thank you.  NOT _the_ _other_
                                | _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to