On Donnerstag, 29. Oktober 2020 15:15:19 CET Peter Maydell wrote: > On Thu, 29 Oct 2020 at 14:06, Christian Schoenebeck > > <qemu_...@crudebyte.com> wrote: > > Ok, I'll use mkdtemp() instead, that avoids other potential parallel > > config > > colissions that I may not have considered yet. > > > > The original motivation against mkdtemp() was that /tmp is isually a > > ramfs, > > hence very limited regarding large file tests. But that's not an issue > > right now. > > How large is "large" here ? > > thanks > -- PMM
E.g. ~10 GiB which might be a problem for cloud based CI platforms. But again, we don't have any 9p test doing that yet. So mkdtemp() is just fine for now. Best regards, Christian Schoenebeck
