Am 28.10.2020 um 15:39 hat Paolo Bonzini geschrieben: > On 28/10/20 12:46, Kevin Wolf wrote: > > I don't think this is the right thing to do at this point. Making more > > use of QOM is an orthogonal problem and would only make solving this one > > harder. > > Making more use of QOM will make this a non-problem. You'll just use > object-add and -object and, when you figure out the QOM schema, it will > just work.
Yes, but figuring out the QOM schema (or rather, what the interface represented by the schema should look like) is the hard part. It is exactly the same hard part that we're currently trying to figure out without also worrying about QOM at the same time. -object and object-add instead of -chardev and chardev-add change the spelling, but solve none of these problems. Kevin
