On Oct 27 11:49, Klaus Jensen wrote:
> From: Klaus Jensen <k.jen...@samsung.com>
>
> Some devices might want to know the return value of dma_memory_rw, so
> pass it along instead of ignoring it.
>
> There are no existing users of the return value, so this patch should be
> safe.
>
> Signed-off-by: Klaus Jensen <k.jen...@samsung.com>
> Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <phi...@redhat.com>
> Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <m...@redhat.com>
> Acked-by: Keith Busch <kbu...@kernel.org>
> ---
> include/hw/pci/pci.h | 3 +--
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/hw/pci/pci.h b/include/hw/pci/pci.h
> index 0a59a06b149d..f19ffe6b4fe8 100644
> --- a/include/hw/pci/pci.h
> +++ b/include/hw/pci/pci.h
> @@ -783,8 +783,7 @@ static inline AddressSpace
> *pci_get_address_space(PCIDevice *dev)
> static inline int pci_dma_rw(PCIDevice *dev, dma_addr_t addr,
> void *buf, dma_addr_t len, DMADirection dir)
> {
> - dma_memory_rw(pci_get_address_space(dev), addr, buf, len, dir);
> - return 0;
> + return dma_memory_rw(pci_get_address_space(dev), addr, buf, len, dir);
> }
>
> static inline int pci_dma_read(PCIDevice *dev, dma_addr_t addr,
> --
> 2.29.1
> Philippe posted a series where this patch is included as well (with a couple of additional reviews I think). Merging that is probably preferable, and I can respin this pull.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
