On Thu, 22 Oct 2020 09:15:28 -0400
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <m...@redhat.com> wrote:

> On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 11:56:32PM +1100, David Gibson wrote:
>  [...]  
>  [...]  
>  [...]  
> > > 
> > > Probably the only way to handle for existing machine types.
> > > For new ones, can't we queue it in host memory somewhere?  
> > 
> > I'm not actually convinced we can't do that even for existing machine
> > types.  
> 
> The difficulty would be in migrating the extra "reuested but defferred"
> state.

Ah, true.  Although we could block migration for the duration instead.

-- 
David Gibson <dgib...@redhat.com>
Principal Software Engineer, Virtualization, Red Hat

Attachment: pgpW6H01K0qwq.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to