Thanks, applied.
On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 3:22 AM, Austin Clements <amdra...@mit.edu> wrote:
> "info mem" groups its output into contiguous ranges with identical
> protection bits, but previously forgot to print the last range.
>
> Signed-off-by: Austin Clements <amdra...@mit.edu>
> ---
> monitor.c | 6 ++++++
> 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/monitor.c b/monitor.c
> index 6a4f8c2..f8ba0ef 100644
> --- a/monitor.c
> +++ b/monitor.c
> @@ -2258,6 +2258,8 @@ static void mem_info_32(Monitor *mon, CPUState *env)
> mem_print(mon, &start, &last_prot, end, prot);
> }
> }
> + /* Flush last range */
> + mem_print(mon, &start, &last_prot, (target_phys_addr_t)1 << 32, 0);
> }
>
> static void mem_info_pae32(Monitor *mon, CPUState *env)
> @@ -2311,6 +2313,8 @@ static void mem_info_pae32(Monitor *mon, CPUState *env)
> mem_print(mon, &start, &last_prot, end, prot);
> }
> }
> + /* Flush last range */
> + mem_print(mon, &start, &last_prot, (target_phys_addr_t)1 << 32, 0);
> }
>
>
> @@ -2385,6 +2389,8 @@ static void mem_info_64(Monitor *mon, CPUState *env)
> mem_print(mon, &start, &last_prot, end, prot);
> }
> }
> + /* Flush last range */
> + mem_print(mon, &start, &last_prot, (target_phys_addr_t)1 << 48, 0);
> }
> #endif
>
> --
> 1.7.5.4
>
>
>
