On Dienstag, 20. Oktober 2020 09:36:10 CEST Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: > On 10/8/20 8:34 PM, Christian Schoenebeck wrote: > > All existing 9pfs test cases are using the 'synth' fs driver so far, which > > means they are not accessing real files, but a purely simulated (in RAM > > only) file system. > > > > Let's make this clear by changing the prefix of the individual qtest case > > names from 'fs/' to 'synth/'. That way they'll be easily distinguishable > > from upcoming new 9pfs test cases supposed to be using a different fs > > driver. > > > > Signed-off-by: Christian Schoenebeck <qemu_...@crudebyte.com> > > Message-Id: > > <e04e75acb849b085c6d6320b2433a15fa935bcff.1602182956.git.qemu_oss@crudeby > > te.com> Signed-off-by: Christian Schoenebeck <qemu_...@crudebyte.com> > > Harmless, but don't need to sign twice ;)
Ah, I thought that's the common way, as Greg's PRs contained 2 SOBs as well, i.e. I thought this was intended to outline the patch author and submaintainer were the same person. BTW I actually did not explicitly add the 2nd SOB. It was rather added by the patchwork client automatically. So maybe it should be fixed in the client to detect an already existing SOB line? Or am missing something here? Best regards, Christian Schoenebeck
