* Peter Xu (pet...@redhat.com) wrote:
> Dave magically found this. Fix them with "0x%x".
>
> Reported-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilb...@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <pet...@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilb...@redhat.com>
> ---
> hw/i386/intel_iommu.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/i386/intel_iommu.c b/hw/i386/intel_iommu.c
> index 749eb6ad63..70ac837733 100644
> --- a/hw/i386/intel_iommu.c
> +++ b/hw/i386/intel_iommu.c
> @@ -2665,7 +2665,7 @@ static uint64_t vtd_mem_read(void *opaque, hwaddr addr,
> unsigned size)
>
> if (addr + size > DMAR_REG_SIZE) {
> error_report_once("%s: MMIO over range: addr=0x%" PRIx64
> - " size=0x%u", __func__, addr, size);
> + " size=0x%x", __func__, addr, size);
> return (uint64_t)-1;
> }
>
> @@ -2716,7 +2716,7 @@ static void vtd_mem_write(void *opaque, hwaddr addr,
>
> if (addr + size > DMAR_REG_SIZE) {
> error_report_once("%s: MMIO over range: addr=0x%" PRIx64
> - " size=0x%u", __func__, addr, size);
> + " size=0x%x", __func__, addr, size);
> return;
> }
>
> --
> 2.26.2
>
--
Dr. David Alan Gilbert / dgilb...@redhat.com / Manchester, UK
