> So there are a number of issues here. Firstly, x86 targets > in particular are worse than others for multi-threaded user > mode: the patch you note is almost certainly not the only > area that needs addressing. (Properly handling the x86 LOCK > prefix by making sure we take a host mutex is very likely > broken, for instance.) If you look in MAINTAINERS you'll see
Just to be curious. *If* QEMU support multithreaded user program, would the different memory (coherence/consistency) model between guest and host architecture become a problem? Regards, chenwj -- Wei-Ren Chen (陳韋任) Computer Systems Lab, Institute of Information Science, Academia Sinica, Taiwan (R.O.C.) Tel:886-2-2788-3799 #1667
