On 10/5/20 6:42 PM, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 05, 2020 at 10:46:38AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> On 20/09/20 17:53, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
>>> Instead of only displaying the property missing, also display
>>> the object name. This help developer to quickly figure out the
>>> mistake without opening a debugger.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4...@amsat.org>
>>> ---
>>>  qom/object.c | 3 ++-
>>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/qom/object.c b/qom/object.c
>>> index 387efb25ebe..257914b1fe3 100644
>>> --- a/qom/object.c
>>> +++ b/qom/object.c
>>> @@ -1259,7 +1259,8 @@ ObjectProperty *object_property_find(Object *obj, 
>>> const char *name,
>>>          return prop;
>>>      }
>>>  
>>> -    error_setg(errp, "Property '.%s' not found", name);
>>> +    error_setg(errp, "Property '%s.%s' not found",
>>> +               object_get_typename(obj), name);
>>>      return NULL;
>>>  }
>>>  
>>>
>>
>> Acked-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com>
>>
>> I think it's okay for qemu-trivial.
> 
> It would be okay, but it doesn't apply on master anymore due to
> the object_propert_find_err() refactor.  I've fixed the conflicts
> and queued it on machine-next.

Oh sorry I didn't noticed, thanks for fixing/queuing!

Phil.

Reply via email to