On Thu, Oct 01, 2020 at 10:48:03AM +0200, Klaus Jensen wrote: > On Oct 1 06:05, Klaus Jensen wrote: > > On Sep 30 15:04, Keith Busch wrote: > > > The code switches on the opcode to invoke a function specific to that > > > opcode. There's no point in consolidating back to a common function that > > > just switches on that same opcode without any actual common code. > > > Restore the opcode specific behavior without going back through another > > > level of switches. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Keith Busch <kbu...@kernel.org> > > > > Reviewed-by: Klaus Jensen <k.jen...@samsung.com> > > > > Point taken. I could've sweared I had a better reason for this. > > > > Can you also remove the nvme_do_aio trace event?
Ah, thanks for pointing that out. I'll fix up the trace. I think you may have a case where this might make sense still in the making? If so we can reevaluate when it's ready.
