On 10/01/20 06:27, Thomas Huth wrote:
> I'm very often getting CC: on rather large patch series that
> modify the ACPI stuff of either ARM or x86, just because the
> bios-table-test is often slightly involved here. I can't say
> much about ACPI, and the bios-table-test is already covered
> by the ACPI section in MAINTAINERS,

Right, the exact same pattern that you're going to exclude in this patch
from under "qtest" is already covered under "ACPI/SMBIOS":

F: tests/qtest/bios-tables-test*

> so I'd rather prefer to
> not getting automatically CC-ed on such patch series anymore.
> If people want my opinion about qtest-related changes, they
> can still put me on CC manually.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <th...@redhat.com>
> ---
>  MAINTAINERS | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
> index e1e8ae277d..d476fbf627 100644
> --- a/MAINTAINERS
> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> @@ -2474,7 +2474,7 @@ S: Maintained
>  F: softmmu/qtest.c
>  F: accel/qtest.c
>  F: tests/qtest/
> -X: tests/qtest/bios-tables-test-allowed-diff.h
> +X: tests/qtest/bios-tables-test*
>  
>  Device Fuzzing
>  M: Alexander Bulekov <alx...@bu.edu>
> 

FWIW:

Acked-by: Laszlo Ersek <ler...@redhat.com>

Thanks
Laszlo


Reply via email to