On 9/28/20 8:09 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
Eric Blake <ebl...@redhat.com> writes:
On 9/25/20 8:52 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
This was my best attempt to open the file read/write, creating it if it
doesn't exist.
Plain
f = open(pathname, "r+", encoding='utf-8')
fails instead of creates, and
f = open(pathname, "w+", encoding='utf-8')
truncates.
If you know a better way, tell me!
IIUC, you need "a+" as the mode, rather than "w+"
Sure this lets me do
f.seek(0)
f.truncate(0)
f.write(text)
to overwrite the old contents on all systems?
As long as you do a single pass over the output (you issue a stream of
f.write() after the truncate, but never a seek), then this will work.
Well, I do seek(), right before the truncate.
Documentation cautions:
[...] 'a' for appending (which on some Unix systems, means that
all
writes append to the end of the file regardless of the current seek
position).
Yes, that means that random access is impossible on such a stream.
But not all file creation patterns require random access.
To be honest, I still prefer the code I wrote, because there the reader
only wonders why I didn't just open(), while here we get to argue about
subtleties of mode "a+".
I kept your os.open, I agree with you here.
(I still rewrote to use the context managers, though.)
